Bench to Bed
Regulation

Physician Group Sues Trump Administration Over Dietary Guidelines Process

A nonprofit group is suing the Trump administration over the process of updating the nation's dietary guidelines, alleging that the government improperly rewrote the guidelines with the help of a 'secret panel' of scientists backed by the beef and dairy industries.

A nonprofit group is suing the Trump administration over the process of updating the nation's dietary guidelines, alleging...

A lawsuit has been filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the federal agencies involved in updating the nation's dietary guidelines improperly rewrote the guidelines.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit that advocates for plant-based diets, brought the suit against the Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The committee claims that these agencies used a "secret panel" of scientists backed by the beef and dairy industries to flip the food pyramid.

The suit alleges that most of the researchers handpicked by the Trump administration to work on the scientific basis of new guidelines had financial ties to beef, dairy, egg, and other interests. They were chosen behind closed doors and given less than three months to finalize a review of the evidence, which was used to justify new dietary advice.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine claims that the government allowed the meat and dairy industries to ghostwrite the Dietary Guidelines. They argue that the government put money in industry's pocket and cholesterol in Americans' arteries.

The lawsuit asks the court to order the guidelines be withdrawn and a new guidelines process - one that follows requirements laid out in the Federal Advisory Committee Act - be initiated.

The new dietary guidelines, which were updated last year, have been met with criticism from many in the nutrition world. The guidelines recommend limiting saturated fat consumption, but also promote foods that are high in saturated fats, such as beef, whole milk, cheese, and eggs.

A 20-person scientific panel had previously recommended plant-based diets and discouraged eating red meat and saturated fats. However, the government disregarded these findings and followed a different set of recommendations.

The public was not aware of the secondary science group formed under Trump, or how it conducted its work, until a "scientific foundation" document appeared on a government website on January 7, the day the new guidelines were released.

## The Controversy Surrounding the Dietary Guidelines

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is not the only group that has raised concerns about the dietary guidelines. Many in the nutrition world have been perplexed by the focus on foods that are high in saturated fats.

## The Lawsuit and Its Implications

The lawsuit filed by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is a significant development in the controversy surrounding the dietary guidelines. If the court rules in favor of the committee, it could lead to a new set of guidelines that are more in line with the recommendations of the scientific panel.

However, it is worth noting that the Trump administration has not commented on the lawsuit. The Department of Health and Human Services has been reached out to for comment, but they have not responded.

The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by those in the nutrition world, as it could have significant implications for the way that dietary guidelines are developed in the future.

## The Future of Dietary Guidelines

The controversy surrounding the dietary guidelines highlights the need for a more transparent and evidence-based process for developing these guidelines. The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is calling for a new guidelines process that follows the requirements laid out in the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

If the court rules in favor of the committee, it could lead to a new set of guidelines that are more in line with the recommendations of the scientific panel. This could have significant implications for the way that Americans eat and the health outcomes that result from those dietary choices.

However, it is worth noting that the outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain, and it will be up to the court to decide whether the government's actions were improper.

Related coverage

More from Regulation